Black book with a gavel icon.

News – Granny Flat Exemptions – Capital Gains Tax

O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers • 12 November 2020

The Federal Government has recently announced that it will be providing a targeted Capital Gains Tax (CGT) exemption for granny flat arrangements, which is expected to commence as early as 1 July 2021, (subject to the passing of legislation to put the exemption into effect).


Importantly, one of the key elements approved by the Federal Government is that, in order to qualify for the exemption, the granny flat arrangements are required to be documented by way of a formal written agreement.

A granny flat arrangement is usually an informal family arrangement which provides for a parent or other relative to reside at the residence of another family member, either by way of occupying a discrete part of a residence or a purpose-built accommodation. In some cases, the accommodation might be as part of a shared living arrangement (such as occupying a room). Currently, in most cases these family arrangements are not documented by way of a formal agreement.


CGT implications arise where there are new buildings, extensions or other improvements which increase the value of the property.


Granny flat arrangements are also significant in respect of social security entitlements as the Federal Government has, through Services Australia (Centrelink), made a number of concessions in respect of the impact that creating a granny flat interest might have on a person’s social security entitlements. As the entitlement to and amount of social security entitlements is subject to means-testing, there are limitations on the value of assets which can be disposed of (the term used by Services Australia being deprived assets) without impacting on those entitlements.


Whilst Centrelink recommend that the arrangements be recorded by way of a formal written agreement, it is not presently a mandatory requirement. The announcement by the Federal Government may materially change this situation, given the requirements for these arrangements to be recorded by way of a formal written agreement.

Capital Gains Tax implications arise where the granny flat improvements add to the value of a residential property. Whist a person’s main residence is CGT–exempt, a granny flat which is separate to the main residence is not treated as part of the main residence for CGT purposes. If the granny flat is fully or partially paid for directly or indirectly by the recipient of the accommodation, then CGT implications might be triggered when the residence is sold.


As to how the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will ascertain whether there is a granny flat arrangement in existence or whether its value adds to a property is a matter which the ATO will need to address. However, it can be expected that there will be an obligation on an owner to self-report, and that there may be some information passing between government departments which might identify such an arrangement (for example, Centrelink having a record of an arrangement at a property involving certain individuals – particularly if provision of a copy of a formal written agreement to Centrelink becomes a part of their reporting requirements).


Recording the granny flat arrangements in writing by way of a formal agreement also assists the parties to that agreement to give consideration to a number of matters which might not otherwise be addressed at the time that the arrangements are being put into place. By virtue of the fact that these arrangements are made between family members, there may be some sensitivity around discussing these matters. However, if a formal written agreement is required by the ATO and also Centrelink, then the requirement simply must be met.


CONSIDERATIONS

Matters to be considered by both parties when documenting a granny flat arrangement include the following:

  • Each of the parties should receive legal and financial advice;
  • What impact the arrangements will have on any social security entitlements;
  • If property is provided as part of the arrangement, what the arrangements are in respect of:
  • the resulting ownership of the property;
  • the costs associated with the transfer of the property; and
  • the costs of modifications to or refurbishment of the property.
  • If funds are provided towards the provision of the accommodation, how the funds provided or to be provided by the recipient of the accommodation are to be categorised. For example, are the funds to be:
  • gift;
  • a loan repayable in full or in part if the accommodation is no longer used;
  • regular payments towards accommodation (i.e. board).
  • What support will be provided to the recipient of the accommodation;
  • Will the family member providing the support be seeking or be entitled to seek a carer’s pension;
  • What are the recipient’s anticipated healthcare needs and what happens if the recipient needs to be moved to a hospital or care facility for a prolonged period of time or indefinitely. For example, will funds be reimbursed to assist with ongoing care?
  • Who is responsible for the maintenance and outgoings of the accommodation;
  • How is this arrangement going to be dealt with in the recipient’s Will and also the Will/s of the family member/s providing the accommodation;
  • If the arrangement involves a capital contribution or a loan, whether the interest of the recipient should be protected by way of security (such as a non-lapsing caveat);
  • What happens if the owner needs to sell the property or his/her family circumstances drastically change (for example if there is a divorce or financial difficulties);
  • Whether the recipient of the accommodation can share that accommodation with another person (such as a new partner, where this relationship is entered into after the granny flat arrangements are put into place).


A more precise analysis of the requirements and implications can be given once the relevant legislation and any guidelines are put in place by the Federal Government.


In the case of existing granny flat arrangements, it is anticipated that these arrangements will also need to be documented in order to meet the requirements of the proposed CGT exemption. This is because current arrangements are not exempt and it is likely they would also need to meet all relevant requirements in order to qualify for the exemption. Accordingly, persons involved in current granny flat arrangements should turn their minds to documenting the arrangements once the position is clearer.


Updates will be provided as these matters are advanced by the Federal Government.


Written by Dale Treanor, Consultant Solicitor, Commercial Law Division


Dale Treanor - Lawyer
O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers • 12 November 2020
Close-up of wooden gavel, books, and handcuffs, representing criminal law.
29 July 2026
Pleading guilty in QLD? Understand sentence discounts & the court process. Criminal Law in Cairns is handled by O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers. Click for info.
A lawyer and a client shaking hands across a desk, with another lawyer signing a document.
20 July 2026
Learn what a solicitor lawyer can do for you in Cairns. O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers offers decades of local experience. Call to book a consultation today.
by Zip Co Limited v Firstmac Limited 10 July 2026
On appeal from the Full Federal Court, the recent High Court decision of Zip Co Limited v Firstmac Limited [2026] HCA 16 provides clarity regarding when the defence to infringement of a trade mark of honest concurrent use is to be assessed and the meaning of “honest”. The plurality held that:  “[5] …the time at which the defences of honest concurrent use are to be assessed is the time of each alleged potential infringement. And the content of the requirement of honesty under s 44(3)(a) is that an alleged infringer must have a state of mind that is honest by the standards of ordinary, decent people”. The critical need to lead positive evidence in circumstances of the prior knowledge attributed to Zip Companies was also highlighted by the Court: in this case, Zip Companies used ‘ZIP’ marks for credit products later in time than Firstmac’s registered mark ‘ZIP’ in class 36 for loan products. Zip Companies failed to establish honesty in the face of circumstances where Zip Companies’ representative became aware of Firstmac’s registered mark as it was cited as an impediment to registration following an application by Zip Companies to register the ZIP marks, and thereafter Zip Companies launched products under the ZIP marks. It was also held that: “[70]… the Zip Companies did not lead evidence sufficient for a finding that, despite knowing of a material impediment to the legitimate use of the Zip Companies' marks, in November 2013 (or subsequently for later potential infringements) Mr Diamond nevertheless considered that consumers would experience no confusion between the Zip Companies' marks and the Firstmac Mark which might enure to the benefit of the Zip Companies. Nor did the Zip Companies lead evidence sufficient for a finding that although Mr Diamond had not turned his mind to these matters, he had not been reckless in his failure to do so. These gaps in the evidentiary record and findings precluded a conclusion that the Zip Companies had proved their honesty.”. We can also take away from the case that it is not fatal to a defence of honest concurrent use that the alleged infringer knew of the existence or registration of the competitor’s mark on or before the alleged infringement/s occurred. A link to the case is here: https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/judgments/judgments-1998-current/zip-co-limited-v-firstmac-limited
View of the hands of a lawyer signing some papers and a wooden gavel on a desk.
24 May 2026
Need solicitors in Cairns for property law? O'Reilly Stevens offers local expertise in contracts, leasing & disputes. Call today for trusted legal guidance.
A partial view of three lawyers discussing documents with a gavel on a table.
25 March 2026
For O’Reilly Stevens Lawyers, call 07 4031 7133 today for solicitors in Cairns, QLD. Provides guidance in property, family, commercial & court proceedings.
Judge with gavel & scales
1 July 2025
Unsure when to call a criminal lawyer in Cairns? Learn the key signs, protect your rights early, and get the legal support you need when it matters most.
Legal documents signed
21 May 2025
Learn how criminal solicitors in Mareeba, QLD can guide you through charges, court, and defence strategies. Call O’Reilly Stevens Lawyers at (07) 4031 7133.
Criminal law book and gavel
20 May 2025
Discover the expertise of a criminal defence lawyer in Mareeba, QLD. Contact us today for top-notch legal support.
by O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers 15 July 2024
Learn about directors' personal liability for trademark infringement and how it affects your business. O'Reilly Stevens provides expert legal advice on intellectual property.
by O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers 30 April 2024
The Australian Pacific Engagement Visa Subclass 192 ballot opens on 3 June 2024. Learn about eligibility, application processes, and more at O'Reilly Stevens.
Show More