Black book with a gavel icon.

News – Commerical leasing Principles during COVID-19

O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers • 24 April 2020

National Cabinet Mandatory Code of Conduct: Commercial Leasing Principles During COVID-19[1] 

The Code is a set of overarching principles to guide arrangements and negotiations between landlords and tenants. The Code will be enacted and regulated via state and territory legislative instruments.[2] The Code will last while the COVID-19 Commonwealth Government’s JobKeeper programme  remains operational. 

The Code provides that: 

  • It applies to a tenant that is an eligible business for the JobKeeper program (i.e. the tenant has an annual turnover of less than $50 million and a 30% or greater loss in revenue). Notwithstanding this, the principles of the Code should apply in spirit to all leasing arrangements for affected businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic. 
  • Its objective is to share the financial risk and cash flow management proportionately between tenants and landlords during the pandemic, and arrangements should be appropriate for a subsequent reasonable recovery period. 
  • If the parties genuinely cannot agree on leasing arrangements, the matter should be referred to applicable dispute resolution processes. 

The overarching principles of the Code include: 

  • The parties should act in a transparent manner and provide each other with sufficient information to achieve outcomes consistent with the Code. 
  • Arrangements agreed under the Code will take into account the impact of COVID-19 on tenants, with specific regard to tenants’ revenue, expenses and profitability. 
  • The parties will assist each other in their respective dealings with stakeholders (i.e. banks). 
  • Landlords should agree to a tailored approach for tenants on a case-by-case basis. 

The leasing principles of the Code include: 

  1. During the COVID-19 period and the recovery period:

a. landlords must not terminate leases due to non-payment of rent; 

b. landlords must not draw upon financial security and guarantees in leases for non-payment of rent; 

c. landlords agree to a freeze rent increases (except for retail leases based on turnover rent). 

  1. In relation to rent reductions and repayments: 

a. landlords must reduce up to 100% of tenants’ rent in the form of waivers and deferrals proportionate to the reduction in the relevant tenants’ trade during the COVID-19 period and the recovery period. Waivers and deferrals can be interpreted to include other agreed variations to existing leases (such as pausing and/or hibernating leases) or other commercial outcomes. Landlords may not recoup a reduction provided by waiver during the term of the lease. Proportionate means rent relief proportionate to reduction in trade as a result of COVID-19 plus the recovery period, consistent with assessments undertaken for eligibility for the JobKeeper program; 

b. rent waived must form at least 50% of rent reductions and should constitute a greater proportion in cases where failure to do so would compromise tenants’ capacity to fulfil ongoing obligations under leases. Regard must be had to landlords’ financial ability to provide such additional waivers. Tenants can waive the requirement for a 50% minimum waiver by agreement; 

c. payment of rent deferrals by tenants must be amortised over the balance of the lease term and for no less than twenty-four months, whichever is greater, unless otherwise agreed; 

d. landlords should allow tenants to extend leases for periods equivalent to the relevant waiver and/or deferral periods in order to provide tenants with additional time to trade on existing lease terms during the recovery period; 

e. where arrangements negotiated under the Code necessitate repayments, no repayment should commence until the earlier of the COVID-19 pandemic ending (as defined by the Australian Government) or the relevant existing lease expiring, and taking into account the recovery period. 

  1. tenants must continue to comply with their lease obligations, subject to any rental agreement negotiated under the Code; and tenants’ material failure to abide by any substantive terms of leases will result in forfeiture of the protections under the Code; 
  2. landlords must pass on to tenants, proportionately, any reduction received in statutory charges (i.e. land tax and council rates); 
  3. where appropriate, landlords should waive recovery of any other tenant expenses and outgoings during periods that tenants are not able to trade; 
  4. no interest, fees and charges should be applied by landlords on deferrals and waivers; 
  5. landlords may not apply any prohibition and levy penalties if tenants reduce opening hours or cease to trade due to COVID-19. 

Parties should negotiate in good faith on the basis of the Code and legislative instruments, bearing in mind that it appears the legislative instruments will apply to leases from 30 March 2020, in line with the commencement of the JobKeeper programme, as seen in the South Australian Act.   

Some examples of proportionality extracted from the Code: 

A 60% loss in turnover would result in a guaranteed 60% cash flow relief. At a minimum, half is provided as rent free/rent waiver for the proportion of which the qualifying tenant’s revenue has fallen. Up to half could be through a deferral of rent, with this to be recouped over at least twenty-four months in a manner that is negotiated by the parties. 

So if the tenant’s revenue has fallen by 100%, then at least 50% of total cash flow relief is rent free/rent waiver and the remainder is a rent deferral. If the qualifying tenant’s revenue has fallen by 30%, then at least 15% of total cash flow relief is rent free/rent waiver and the remainder is rent deferral. 

Care should be taken to ensure that any repayment of the deferred rent does not compromise the ability of the affected tenant to recover from the crisis.

 

Please Note: This is general information distilled from the Code referred to herein and does not constitute legal advice, and it should not be relied upon in lieu of legal advice.

Written by Kim Cousins, Associate, Commercial Law Division


Kim Cousins - Lawyer

– Kim Cousins
kim@oreillystevens.com

O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers • 24 April 2020
Close-up of wooden gavel, books, and handcuffs, representing criminal law.
29 July 2026
Pleading guilty in QLD? Understand sentence discounts & the court process. Criminal Law in Cairns is handled by O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers. Click for info.
A lawyer and a client shaking hands across a desk, with another lawyer signing a document.
20 July 2026
Learn what a solicitor lawyer can do for you in Cairns. O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers offers decades of local experience. Call to book a consultation today.
by Zip Co Limited v Firstmac Limited 10 July 2026
On appeal from the Full Federal Court, the recent High Court decision of Zip Co Limited v Firstmac Limited [2026] HCA 16 provides clarity regarding when the defence to infringement of a trade mark of honest concurrent use is to be assessed and the meaning of “honest”. The plurality held that:  “[5] …the time at which the defences of honest concurrent use are to be assessed is the time of each alleged potential infringement. And the content of the requirement of honesty under s 44(3)(a) is that an alleged infringer must have a state of mind that is honest by the standards of ordinary, decent people”. The critical need to lead positive evidence in circumstances of the prior knowledge attributed to Zip Companies was also highlighted by the Court: in this case, Zip Companies used ‘ZIP’ marks for credit products later in time than Firstmac’s registered mark ‘ZIP’ in class 36 for loan products. Zip Companies failed to establish honesty in the face of circumstances where Zip Companies’ representative became aware of Firstmac’s registered mark as it was cited as an impediment to registration following an application by Zip Companies to register the ZIP marks, and thereafter Zip Companies launched products under the ZIP marks. It was also held that: “[70]… the Zip Companies did not lead evidence sufficient for a finding that, despite knowing of a material impediment to the legitimate use of the Zip Companies' marks, in November 2013 (or subsequently for later potential infringements) Mr Diamond nevertheless considered that consumers would experience no confusion between the Zip Companies' marks and the Firstmac Mark which might enure to the benefit of the Zip Companies. Nor did the Zip Companies lead evidence sufficient for a finding that although Mr Diamond had not turned his mind to these matters, he had not been reckless in his failure to do so. These gaps in the evidentiary record and findings precluded a conclusion that the Zip Companies had proved their honesty.”. We can also take away from the case that it is not fatal to a defence of honest concurrent use that the alleged infringer knew of the existence or registration of the competitor’s mark on or before the alleged infringement/s occurred. A link to the case is here: https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases-and-judgments/judgments/judgments-1998-current/zip-co-limited-v-firstmac-limited
View of the hands of a lawyer signing some papers and a wooden gavel on a desk.
24 May 2026
Need solicitors in Cairns for property law? O'Reilly Stevens offers local expertise in contracts, leasing & disputes. Call today for trusted legal guidance.
A partial view of three lawyers discussing documents with a gavel on a table.
25 March 2026
For O’Reilly Stevens Lawyers, call 07 4031 7133 today for solicitors in Cairns, QLD. Provides guidance in property, family, commercial & court proceedings.
Judge with gavel & scales
1 July 2025
Unsure when to call a criminal lawyer in Cairns? Learn the key signs, protect your rights early, and get the legal support you need when it matters most.
Legal documents signed
21 May 2025
Learn how criminal solicitors in Mareeba, QLD can guide you through charges, court, and defence strategies. Call O’Reilly Stevens Lawyers at (07) 4031 7133.
Criminal law book and gavel
20 May 2025
Discover the expertise of a criminal defence lawyer in Mareeba, QLD. Contact us today for top-notch legal support.
by O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers 15 July 2024
Learn about directors' personal liability for trademark infringement and how it affects your business. O'Reilly Stevens provides expert legal advice on intellectual property.
by O'Reilly Stevens Lawyers 30 April 2024
The Australian Pacific Engagement Visa Subclass 192 ballot opens on 3 June 2024. Learn about eligibility, application processes, and more at O'Reilly Stevens.
Show More